Have you noticed that harsh non-compete agreements, invention assignment contracts, or strict protection of copyright and patents, are waging an increasingly fierce war over people and their ideas?
Beyond alarming questions of what is "fair" to the innovators themselves, few have considered how these human capital controls might impact the quality and quantity of innovation--and ultimately economic growth.
In her timely new book, "TALENT WANTS TO BE FREE," Professor Orly Lobel challenges conventional wisdom about competition, secrecy, motivation and creativity to reveal how our "War for Talent" is backfiring on our quest for innovation. Drawing on original research into motivating creativity, analysis of recent litigation, and empirical data from economics, psychology and network science, Lobel explores how the ways in which we fight over talent can either enhance or inhibit the innovative spirit of an organization.
We have all been trained that the more control we have, the more successful we will be.
That's why on Amazon every management book with the word "surprise" in its title is about how to avoid or prevent the phenomena. Businesses hate uncertainty. You can't forecast or anticipate surprises so they're seen as either irrelevant or as threats.
Yet, the power of surprise is necessary to create business breakthroughs. Something fresh and new produces a significant leap forward. When we experience a game-changing product or service, we feel positively surprised.
And, during the process of creating breakthroughs, surprises inevitably crop up along the way. Success depends on our ability to interpret and respond to unexpected good and bad events, unanticipated customer comments and other surprising experiences.
New Mindsets are the Missing Link
In LEAPFROGGING, author Soren Kaplan reveals why this command-and-control mindset is exactly what stymies innovation. When it comes to big ideas, leaders search for the inspiration that will transform their business. Other leaders lament they have lots of ideas but just can't get traction with any of them. They know something is missing, but they can't pinpoint it.
The leapfrogging life cycle that Kaplan describes in his book is not a step-by-step how to guide. But it does outline the key phases and dynamics that characterize the process of leading business breakthroughs. The leapfrogging life cycle traces the path to breakthroughs by describing the leadership and organizational dynamics involved at various phases over time. The leapfrogging life cycle quite literally depicts the ups and downs involved in creating breakthroughs.
If you want a game changing breakthrough, customers will rarely ask for it....you need to do something that's meaningful for yourself first and foremost. After you have figured that out, then go and test your ideas with customers and let the surprises roll.
Accordingly, individuals and firms each need strong and weak connections to thrive. When it comes to finding out about new jobs, new information or new ideas, "weak ties" are always more important than strong ties. Your friends and fellow workers, after all, occupy the same world that you do. Your acquaintances, on the other hand, by definition occupy a very different world than you. They are much more likely to know something that you don't. Acquaintances represent a source of social power...and...the more acquaintances you have the more powerful you are.
We need diverse social and professional connections to innovate. In every field, human interaction is necessary to seed the first ideas for groundbreaking inventions.
Forming the next winning team is a matter of having highly networked and experienced collaborators but not necessarily the same ones you worked with previously. Rather, introducing new blood into a creative team enhances the likelihood of success.
Today, science offers us new tools to test the connections among individuals and their relations to human activity. The studies of inventor networks finds that the density of a network is highly correlated with the number of inventions in that network. This means that the more people are in contact, the more creative each person becomes. The connections between innovators increase the overall numbers of patents as well as the number of co-authored patents in an area. Put simply, a dense network is more collaborative and more productive as a whole.
Network studies of patent citations (references to existing patents in newly filed patents) also reveal that inventions that start in places that are more industrially diverse receive more than twice the number of citations than those developed in smaller or more homogeneous towns. If you invent something while working in a vibrant and diverse place, your invention has a greater likelihood to soar and succeed. This last observation leads us to the importance of diversity and interdisciplinarity in the art and science of innovation.

For example, here in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the University of Michigan is constructing a 600 living suite building for graduate students with diverse interests who will interact within a number of open meeting areas throughout the building so that interdisciplinary conversations may take place.
In the age of the Renaissance, those who were found to be gifted were encouraged to develop skills in all areas of knowledge, both science and art. Leonardo da Vinci was what we moderns call a Renaissance Man: he was a scientist, engineer, anatomist, botanist, painter, sculptor, architect, mathematician, writer and an inventor. Da Vinci traveled in Europe throughout his early adulthood, apprenticing with different artists and thinkers. Along the way he invented, designed and theorized such diverse novelties as helicopters, hang gliders, solar power, musical instruments, cannons, tanks and advancements in hydrodynamics. Thousands of pages of notebooks record Da Vinci's tremendous ingenuity and amazing range of interests.
Versatility and interdiciplinarity were the hallmarks of the Renaissance. Even today, the fact that the best breakthroughs occur between technically distant fields echoes the Renaissance emphasis on multidisciplinarity and reinforces its importance. The payoffs of diversity and multidisciplinarity are real. Breakthroughs that do arise from multidisciplinary work, though extremely rare, are frequently of unusually high value; superior to the best innovations achieved by conventional approaches. This means that merging diverse disciplines is a high-risk, high-reward business.
Sources:
Orly Lobel: Talent Wants to Be Free
Soren Kaplan: Leapfrogging: Harness the Power of Surprise for Business Breakthroughs
John Agno: Can't Get Enough Leadership